Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren!
Liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen!
Wir laden Sie herzlich zur
*Arbeitstagung*
*Das Sollen im Schnittpunkt von Endlichem und Unendlichem*
*in Hegels /Wissenschaft der Logik/*
**
am *3. Juni*, von *9:30 bis 17:00 Uhr* im *ReWi-Hörsaal*, Schenkenstraße
8-10, Stiege 2, 4. Stock, 1010 Wien ein. Organisiert wird die
Veranstaltung vom Institut für Philosophie in Kooperation mit dem
Institut für Rechtsphilosophie.
In dieser eintägigen Arbeitstagung soll die eigentümliche Denkbestimmung
des Sollens sowie seine spekulativ-logische Ausprägung einmal genau in
den Fokus genommen werden. Methodisch findet die Auseinandersetzung in
Form eines /Close-Readings /des seinslogischen Abschnitts β. Die
Schranke und das Sollen statt.
Es wird Kaffee, Tee, Getränke, Kuchen und andere kleine Stärkungen geben.
Die Teilnahme ist ohne Voranmeldung möglich. Nähere Informationen können
der Ankündigung im Anhang entnommen werden.
Link zum Vorbereitungsdokument:
https://www.academia.edu/101993415/Herkunft_des_Sollens_aus_den_vorausliege…
Wir freuen uns auf einen lebendigen Austausch und die gemeinsame Arbeit
am Begriff!
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Thomas Auinger
Friedrich Grimmlinger
Linda Lilith Obermayr
Liebe Kolleg:innen! Dear colleagues!
Ich möchte Sie gerne auf folgende Veranstaltung hinweisen:
Foucault im Hörsaal
Workshop mit Ulrich Johannes Schneider (Leipzig)
Institut für Philosophie | Mi 07.06.2023 | 16:45-19:45 Uhr | Hörsaal 2i (NIG)
Organisation: Gerald Posselt & Gerhard Unterthurner
Website: https://language.univie.ac.at
Mit Beiträgen von Ulrich Johannes Schneider, Melissa Augustin, Charlotte Bomert und Sebastian Krach
Der Workshop wird sich mit dem Buch Foucault im Hörsaal: Über das mündliche Philosophieren (Turia + Kant 2022)<https://www.turia.at/titel/uschneider.php> von Ulrich Johannes Schneider befassen - mit Fokus auf die Kapitel 8, 9 & 14. Die Texte werden auf Anfrage gerne zugeschickt: gerald.posselt(a)univie.ac.at<mailto:gerald.posselt@univie.ac.at>. Eine Anmeldung ist nicht erforderlich.
Mit besten Grüßen
Gerald Posselt
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
PD Dr. Gerald Posselt, M.A.
Institut für Philosophie | Universität Wien
Universitätsstraße 7 (NIG, Zi. D304) | 1010 Wien
E-Mail: gerald.posselt(a)univie.ac.at<mailto:gerald.posselt@univie.ac.at>
Website: Language and Violence / Critical Theories Network<https://language.univie.ac.at/>
Posselt, Gerald / Hetzel, Andreas: "Rhetoric as Critique: Toward a Rhetorical Philosophy", in: Theory, Culture & Society 40 (3), 2023, 41-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764231162046.
Dear all,
we cordially invite you to the next talk of the APSE lecture series,
delivered by Peter Vickers (Durham University).
Title: The Institute of Ascertaining Scientific Consensus, or, How to
Measure Scientific Community Opinion and Influence People
When/Where: Thursday, June 1^st , 3-5pm, HS 2H, NIG
Abstract:
A solid, international scientific consensus is the best signal humanity
ever gets that a specific scientific statement articulates an
“established scientific fact”. It is thus surprising that there
currently exists no good way to measure the strength of scientific
consensus regarding a specific statement of interest. Indeed, scientists
themselves don’t know when a claim can be called a ‘fact’ (as Ernst Mayr
used to complain, and as one IPCC author recently complained). A good
method for quickly, efficiently assessing mass scientific opinion is
urgently needed, especially given the rise in ‘fake news’ and misleading
information in the public sphere. Perhaps most significantly of all,
recent studies have demonstrated the power of expert-community consensus
information to correct misconceptions of laypersons, and, crucially,
impact upon relevant choices and actions of those laypersons (such as
getting vaccinated against COVID-19). The Institute for Ascertaining
Scientific Consensus (IASC) seeks to become humanity’s premier means for
measuring scientific community opinion on a given statement of interest.
In June 2023 it conducts its first mass survey, targeting 20,000
scientists across 30 different academic institutions.
Best wishes,
Franziska Reinhard (on behalf of the APSE unit)
Hi all,
The Gender Studies Association Austria (ÖGGF) and the
Inter*Trans_Non-Binary working group will receive Hil Malatino (Penn
State University) for an online lecture on Reed Erickson's archival
material, entitled: "The Erickson Journals: Speculating the Trans
1970s".
The lecture will take place on Zoom on Wednesday, May 31, 2023, at 18:00
(Vienna time). I have attached the flyer to this email.
Everyone is very much welcome to attend. To get the Zoom link, please,
contact Vitória Monteiro at the following email address: office(a)oeggf.at
English automated captions should be available.
All best,
Flora
--
Flora Löffelmann, MA MA
University assistant & doctoral candidate
Department of Philosophy at University of Vienna
Pronouns: they/them (for more info see:
https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why/)
Happy about a gender neutral "hello"!
Sehr geehrte Kolleg:innen,
ich möchte Sie im Namen von Khôra, der Plattform für philosophische Diskussion, herzlich zum nächsten Kolloquium einladen.
Termin: 25.05.2023, 18:30 - 20:00, HS 3f, Neues Institutsgebäude
Thema: Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Das Sichtbare und das Unsichtbare
Ein kurzer Text von Merleau-Ponty dient uns als Ausgangspunkt für die weitere Diskussion und soll in sein Denken einführen. Auf Anfrage wird der Text gerne zugesendet.
Weitere Informationen sowie eine Mailingliste finden Sie auf unserer Homepage.
https://www.khora.philo.at/
Danach ist im Café Gagarin reserviert.
Wir freuen uns auf eure Teilnahme!
Liebe Grüße
Sebastian Krach
Dear all,
we cordially invite you to the upcoming talk of the APSE - lecture
series, delivered by Ariane Hanemaayer (Brandon University)
Title: Where it hurts: Making Pain Medicine
When/Where: 25.5., 15-17pm, HS 2H
If you are interested in joining us for dinner/drinks afterwards, write
me an email (sophie.juliane.veigl(a)univie.ac.at)! everyone welcome!
Abstract:
What makes pain problematic? The nature of pain is contested, and over
the 20th century, researchers from biomedical fields as diverse as
surgery, anesthesiology, physiology, and neurology have sought to
develop a unified theory to represent its causes and effects. In the
clinic, the status of pain is subjective. Over the last century, many
efforts have been made to raise awareness of the under-examined aspects
of pain and to objectify it through the standardization of its
measurement. There remains, however, a gap between the knowledge of and
intervention on pain that has troubled the evidence-based medicine
paradigm. In this presentation I explain the nature of this gap as a
result of particular discursive and institutional relations. In
particular, I focus on the rise of clinical pain measurement scales
alongside the professionalization of the subspecialty of pain medicine.
Drawing on material from a broader genealogical project on the
biomedical sciences of pain, I argue that the techniques of pain
management were developed in relation to a particular shift in the
notion of clinical judgment within the medical discourse. I will situate
this knowledge development within the broader societal and institutional
events that rendered pain problematic, focusing on the establishment of
the first pain clinic in the USA and the International Society for the
Study of Pain.
Kind regards,
Sophie Veigl on behalf of the APSE-Unit
--
Dr. Sophie Juliane Veigl, BSc., BA., MSc., MA.
Institut für Philosophie, Universität Wien
E-Mail: sophie.juliane.veigl(a)univie.ac.at
my pronouns are she/her
Dear all,
together with several people all over the university and Manu Sharma
from our own institute, I am organizing an InterGender – International
Consortium for Interdisciplinary Feminist Research Training course for
PhD and late stage MA students, which will happen in October and is
entitled "Learning to Read Differently".
You can even get 7,5 or 10 ECTS credits for it!
Here's a short description:
Much academic work relies on existing texts and their interpretation. As
scholars, we necessarily build on these knowledges transmitted to us by
others in order to try to better understand power relations and their
modes of action, to form our own arguments based on the texts, to make
sense of certain social phenomena and to contribute to thinking_feeling
about the world. All too often, this process of reading becomes so
normalized that we hardly think about the consequences and premises of
these practices of reading themselves. Therefore, we want to dedicate
this PhD and MA course to the goal of “Learning to Read Differently”.
Throughout the course, we will engage not only with how we read “texts”
as they are commonly understood, but also with how we interpret the
fabric of reality and the situations and phenomena we encounter in our
research and beyond. Together, we want to explore what we choose to read
or not to read, as well as the political implications that arise from
these practices. Thus, the course aims to support participants in
exercising reading practices and research methods that enable them to
critically reflect upon the “standard” practices usually governed by
white euro-anglo-centric academia, to challenge them, and to try out
different approaches.
Deadline for application is June 18, 2023.
We invite all those who are interested to apply, and are happy if you
also widely share this call with others!
All the best,
Flora
--
Flora Löffelmann, MA MA
University assistant & doctoral candidate
Department of Philosophy at University of Vienna
Pronouns: they/them (for more info see: https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why/)
Happy about a gender neutral "hello"!
Dear all,
UPsalon and the Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy cordially invite
you to a jointly organized pragmatic-academic event: "Combatting
Gendered Marginalization and Exclusion - Good Practices for
Philosophers". The workshop will be facilitated by Stephanie Deig
(University of Lucerne).
When: May 23rd, 4-6pm
Where: VinziRast-Lokal mittendrin
This workshop is open to persons of all genders working and studying at
all levels of the department. We especially invite people with extensive
teaching experience to share their perspectives and experiences on
gendered exclusions and bystanding in academic settings.
Please sign up to the workshop via the following link:
https://forms.gle/6Dw4oDWibNCWCRTX7
Note that we only have 20 open spots; we will allocate them via a “first
come, first serve” system.
Brief workshop description:
“The field of academic philosophy has a serious problem with the
under-representation of women as well as persons who do not identify
with the gender assigned to them at birth. This is due to structural
forms of gendered marginalization and exclusion that create unsafe and
harmful environments. In the first part of this workshop, participants
will be introduced to how specific mechanisms, such as implicit bias,
stereotype threat, as well as sexual and moral harassment manifest
within philosophical settings: working, teaching, and learning, and how
transforming certain conditions and practices could help combat them. In
the second half of the workshop, participants will be given a
theoretical introduction to bystander interventions and be encouraged
(but not required) and given space to share their own experiences
relevant to these questions to create awareness and discuss potential
strategies that could be enacted locally. We will conclude by using
these experiences as a basis for discussion about how bystanders can
safely and productively intervene in instances of gendered wrongdoings.
Even though the workshop focuses on gender-based exclusions, the
convener seeks to create a space for discussing marginalization from an
intersectional perspective."
If you have a topic that you’d particularly like to discuss or are
interested in contributing to the workshop, please contact Stephanie
Deig at: stephanie.deig(a)unilu.ch
Stephanie Deig, MA, is a PhD Candidate at the University of Lucerne. She
is a co-founder of two organizations that have worked to combat gendered
inequalities in the academic field of philosophy in Switzerland and is
active as a board member with The Society for Women* in Philosophy
Switzerland."
Here you can find the link to the Good Practice Guide that Stephanie
bases the presentation on (it is in DE and EN).
https://www.swipswitzerland.org/good-practice-guide+
And here the event description on our website:
https://upsalon.univie.ac.at/events/
Kind regards,
Sonja (on behalf of UPsalon)
--
Sonja Riegler, BA BA MA
She/They
Prae Doc Philosophy
University of Vienna
Liebe Kolleg*innen, liebe Freund*innen,
wir möchten Euch herzlich zu unserer Konferenz "International Planning
for Freedom. Otto Neuraths demokratische Planungstheorie im Kontext der
Klimakrise" einladen.
ELisabeth Nemeth & Günther Sandner (Organisator*innen)
Dear colleagues, dear friends,
we would like to cordially invite you to our conference "International
Planning for Freedom. Otto Neurath's democratic planning theory in the
context of the climate crisis".
Elisabeth Nemeth & Günther Sandner (organisers)
International Conference:
International Planning for Freedom. Otto Neurath's democratic planning
theory in the context of the climate crisis
A cooperation between Institute Vienna Circle (University of Vienna),
Vienna Circle Society (Vienna), Chamber of Labor (Vienna), FWF Project
Isotype. Origin, development, legacy (P 31500), Wien Museum.
Only a few years ago it was hardly imaginable that demands for planned
economy measures would be raised and publicly discussed again. Now the
time has come. Ulrike Herrmann's book "Das Ende des Kapitalismus. Warum
Wachstum und Klimaschutz nicht vereinbar sind – und wie wir in Zukunft
leben werden" (2022) is a bestseller. Her central thesis is discussed in
numerous public media: The transition from growth-dependent capitalism
to a social and ecological circular economy will only be possible
through a "private planned economy".
What she understands by this has striking similarities with the ideas of
economic planning that Otto Neurath conceived even before the First
World War and continued to develop until the end of his life in 1945. An
important point of reference for Neurath was Josef Popper-Lynkeus. The
latter justified the demand for overall social planning with a radically
individualistic ethic. Seen from today, this combination is surprising
and inspiring - not least because Popper-Lynkeus and Neurath were among
the first to introduce ecological viewpoints into economics.
A highlight of the conference will be the screening of the film "Land of
Promise" (UK 1946). The film was conceived by Neurath as a "film
argument" and directed by Paul Rotha. It argues for combating the
housing shortage in post-war England with extensively planned housing
programme. The arguments put forward in the film bear a remarkable
resemblance to the arguments Ulrike Herrmann puts forward today for a
"private planned economy" as a transition to a circular economy.
June 12th, 2023: Chamber of Labor - Bildungszentrum, Theresianumgasse
16-18, 1040 Vienna
Conference language: German
Please pre-register: Https://wien.arbeiterkammer.at/veranstaltungen
(registration open from next week)
June 13th, 2023: Erika Weinzierl-Hoersaal, University of Vienna,
Universitätsring 1, 1010 Vienna
Conference language: English
Please pre-register: office.wienerkreis(a)univie.ac.at
ENTRANCE FREE. Please find the detailed program attached.
PLEASE NOTE two events closely related to our conference:
Institute Vienna Circle Philosophy of Science Colloquium Special Panel:
Utopianism, Rationality, and Thought Experiments in Viennese Late
Enlightenment
June 14th, 2023, 15:00-17:00
Institut für Philosophie, Neues Institutsgebäude (NIG),
Universitätsstraße 7, Lecture Room 2i
https://philevents.org/event/show/110253 Contact:
alexander.linsbichler(a)jku.at
The Metrics of Energy: Accounting for Nature in the History of Social
Science and Ecological Economics
June 15th and 16th, 2023
International Workshop, organised by Anna Echterhölter and Marco Vianna
Franco,
University of Vienna (Key Research Area History of Science) in
cooperation with the
Institute for Advanced Studies IHS Vienna (research group Energy,
Environment, and Sustainable Economic Structures)
https://fsp-wissenschaftsgeschichte.univie.ac.at/upcoming-events/einzelansi…
--
ao. Univ.-Prof.i.R. Dr. Elisabeth Nemeth
Institut für Philosophie der Universität Wien
1010 Wien, Universitätsstraße 7
T: +43-1-4277-46480
M: +43-664-60277-46480
elisabeth.nemeth(a)univie.ac.at
https://elisabethnemeth.com/
Sehr geehrte Kolleg:innen,
ich möchte Sie im Namen von Khôra, der Plattform für philosophische Diskussion, herzlich zum nächsten Kolloquium einladen.
Termin: 11.05.2023, 18:30 - 20:00, HS 3f, Neues Institutsgebäude
Thema: Bataille: Denken heißt Grenzen überschreiten
Ein kurzer Text von Georges Bataille dient uns als Ausgangspunkt für die weitere Diskussion und soll in sein Denken einführen.
Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf unserer Homepage.
https://www.khora.philo.at/
Danach ist im Café Gagarin reserviert.
Wir freuen uns auf eure Teilnahme!
Liebe Grüße
Sebastian Krach