Re: [Philweb] [Info] Kurt Gödel Preis 2021

Lieber Ratfragender, liebe, heftig streitende Liste, danke für den Hinweis auf den Wettbewerb zur Frage der Existenz / Nicht-Existenz „der Zeit“ - wie immer man sie auffassen möge. In unserer Arbeitsgruppe haben wir, wie ja schon hier vorgestellt, ein Konzept semantischer Zeit entwickelt, und dieses auf Tagungen vorgestellt, zuletzt auf einer Systemiker-Tagung im November diesen Jahres. Den abstract hierzu findet man bei researchgate.net <http://researchgate.net/> unter https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356174935_Synopsis-Thomas_Frohlich… <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356174935_Synopsis-Thomas_Frohlich_2>, sowie auf der website der Organisation https://www.isscsh.org/isscsh-events/isscsh-past-conferences/5th-internatio… <https://www.isscsh.org/isscsh-events/isscsh-past-conferences/5th-international-conference-for-systems-and-complexity-sciences-for-health/> Thomas Fröhlich The Semantic Systems approach as a way to manage the New Normal The ISSCSH talk's synopsis In a semantic systems approach, we introduce an interaction-based model of active system elements. Each element is seen sourced in its underlaying potential. The potential guarantees the element's distinct insideness. Also reigning its interactional specifics, it allows each coherent inside to specifically combine with other insides, to create larger coherent systems via adaptive convergence. Issuing distinct, but not isolated insideness, our model allows access to the topic of individuality, understood as enacting personhood in specific interaction with a context, and with a manifold of parallel contexts. In the practical approach, we strengthen context-sensitive individuality in care and healthcare settings. This goal is achieved by interacting in groups emerging from voluntary engagement and participation. To avoid psycho-bubble and potentially deleterious disclosure of personal topics, we use as-if techniques in the form of improv theatre and a range of similar techniques. The intended atmosphere is one of relaxation and fun. An island of freedom apart from, and not dominated by, the overregulated realm of institutional metrics: this is, what may emerge from this specified interaction. "Laugh along the way" gives the semantic energy input necessary to redefine individuality and personal resources in a contextually adapted, meaningful form. In not denying, but ironizing other coherences' negative impact, participation in these free groups helps surviving in the New Normal, the authoritarian, mandate-and exclusion-based climate of current political mainstream. Auf researchgate.net <http://researchgate.net/> ist auch unser Zeit-Konzept kurz dargestellt: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355162752_Thomas_Frohlich_Metric_v… <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355162752_Thomas_Frohlich_Metric_versus_real_time> Metric space, time and energy are not the empiric ones. Instead, real space, as well as real, empiric time are just aspects of the empiric unit made of semantic space, semantic time, and semantic energy Extrapolation of differentiable aspects up to the level where they appear to be separate entities and instances on their own, lead to the concepts of metric space and time, and a corresponding concept of metric energy, the latter based on the false concepts of mutually decontextualised time and space. Is the term 'false' appropriate for concepts that undoubtedly are practical, and show practical effects? Here, 'false' means unempirical, because in fact space, time and energy perform as an inseparable unit in every single moment. This unified trinity has aspects that may be distinguished, but these aspects refer to the same unity which-in and of itself-is inseparable and always performs as a unit. The question is how to correctly address differentiable aspects of an empiric unit. The problem is that each of the separable aspects intrinsically has features of the others, so that semantic space has no pure spatiality in the common, metric sense, neither has semantic time pure temporality, like what is mapped in everyday use of a so-called temporal 'dimension'. Instead, spatiality in the empiric approach together with temporality and energising transforms into structured opening of a potential-based action and interaction 'space', that right from start is impinged with the directed grip towards its future, this way realising its own timing and energising input. The generation of an action and interaction space soaked with its intrinsic, genuine timing and energising results in another action and interaction space, and so forth. The common ground of timing, spacing, and energising is their joint being specifically, individually coherently structured; so, it is the characterising coherence providing the source of the qualified timing, spacing, and energising. Die zugehörige Artikelserie: Thomas Fröhlich, FF Bevier, Alicja Babakhani, Peter Henningsen, David S. Miall †, Seija Sandberg, Arbogast Schmitt, The World of Meaning The Coherence Approach wird voraussichtlich 2022 in einem Journal (EJPCH, Wiley) erscheinen. Viele Grüße und Allen ein glückliches Neues Jahr, Thomas