Lieber Ingo,
ich danke Dir für Deine wie immer sehr hifreichen Anregungen und Literaturhinweise! Ich
habe daraufhn den sich unterscheidenden Fokus meines Ansatzes gleich noch einmal deutlich
zu machen versucht.
Die transition state theory, auf der sich der Autor u.a. bezieht wurde ja von Michael
Polanyi mitgeprägt, der zusammen mit Henry Eyring die chemische Reaktionskinetik zu
entwickeln half. Sein Konzept des impliziten Wissens ähnelt einem potentia-actus-Konzept…
Viele Grüße,
Thomas
Hier meine Reaktion auf Deinen Hinweis
Trans-individual creation of individuality: the general scheme of creating non-general
individuality
The physical properties of DNA, serving as a graphical template of semantic
inside-generation in the proposed approach have been studied extensively (Lit see for
example Michel Peyrard (2004) Nonlinear dynamics and statistical physics of DNA,
Nonlinearity 17 (2004) R1–R40, DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/17/2/R01, available at:
stacks.iop.org/Non/17/R1 <http://stacks.iop.org/Non/17/R1>, last accessed, June 8th,
2025. Yet, a general scheme of creating non-general individuality has not been explored,
most probably because it is based on time, that is, on generating specific timing within
general time, and not on space. Individuality is primarily a mode of time and not of
space. Being focused on spatial properties like spatial shape, spatial distances, spatial
instead of temporal fields, observation starts with position, and not with action.
Focusing on action as co-activity converging from distinct sources differs from
considering action primarily on the form of spatial motion of one single observed entity.
The latter’s behavior may be completely passive and lack the quality of being an
individualizable source of coaction as interaction. Different to the input provided by two
or more independent agencies, its contribution to shaping the resulting interaction is
limited to trans-individual parameters like mass, temperature, internal spatial geometry
et cetera.
Action considering the other’s action, embedded in both the own and the other’s doing
takes not existent before in the concerning middle, it co-creates a co-activity-resulting
inside made of not only the interaction partners’ individual activity but also of their
mutual consideration, adaptively transforming the non-related activity into a genuinely
related and relational one. So, the activities continue to emerge from their own sources
but alter into implying relationally oriented and specified consideration. The interaction
does not combine the original activities but changes these precursors in a mutually
dependent, bilaterally enriching way. It is this selective preference lived as orientation
together with the iterated notice and consideration of the partner’s intrinsic content
that generates a content transcending the previously dynamic one. The specific
in-between-distinct-sources quality then corresponds to the emergence and coming to live
of something not there and alive before, an in-between quality as the interacting
processes’ interactional semantic, distinctively relational interior contrasting the
separated, non-relational past of the isolated precursor process with a newborn identity,
that in turn is able to act in its own right, enacting its own, individual perspective,
shedding new light to further actional sources acting as its temporally defined outside,
to become part of its potential future. So, the definition of inside versus outside here
has a generative quality, it is based on a distinct form of timing different to the
ancestors’ timing, a newly emerged form of temporality.
Replacing the exclusively spatial meaning of being-inside by a dynamic- and
emergence-related temporal one changes it from an arbitrarily changeable one, depending
only of the posing agency’s will to a mutually dependent, provision- and structured
implementation-dependent one. This temporal, action-sourced inside consisting of qualified
and qualifying interaction cannot be dissected from the originating sources any more:
because of its categorical generative post- and co-existence dependency it cannot be
replaced by another, independent one, treating it as a seemingly single, isolated, not
genesis-dependent entity. So, we have an integer whole as a mutually considering
co-dynamic that cannot be cracked into elementary pieces and single contributors without
losing its identity. It inheres adjusted, informed temporality in enriched combination,
dynamically transcending the precursors’ one.
Am 08.06.2025 um 13:31 schrieb Ingo Tessmann über
PhilWeb <philweb(a)lists.philo.at>at>:
Moin Thomas,
Deiner Metaphorik vermag ich kaum zu folgen; zum Glück haben wir auch Gemeinsamkeiten.
Falls Du die Grundlagenarbeit zur Physik der DNA noch nicht kennen solltest:
"Nonlinear dynamics and statistical physics of DNA" by Michel Peyrard:
http://moad.univ-lyon1.fr/sessions/Albi2007/nonlinearity_paper.pdf
<http://moad.univ-lyon1.fr/sessions/Albi2007/nonlinearity_paper.pdf>
Abstract "DNA is not only an essential object of study for biologists — it also
raises very interesting questions for physicists. This paper discuss its nonlinear
dynamics, its statistical mechanics, and one of the experiments that one can now perform
at the level of a single molecule and which leads to a non-equilibrium transition at the
molecular scale. After a review of experimental facts about DNA, we introduce simple
models of the molecule and show how they lead to nonlinear localization phenomena that
could describe some of the experimental observations. In a second step we analyse the
thermal denaturation of DNA, i.e. the separation of the two strands using standard
statistical physics tools as well as an analysis based on the properties of a single
nonlinear excitation of the model. The last part discusses the mechanical opening of the
DNA double helix, performed in single molecule experiments. We show how transition state
theory combined with the knowledge of the equilibrium statistical physics of the system
can be used to analyse the results.“
IT
_______________________________________________
PhilWeb Mailingliste -- philweb(a)lists.philo.at
Zur Abmeldung von dieser Mailingliste senden Sie eine Nachricht an
philweb-leave(a)lists.philo.at