Am 10.01.2020 um 19:31 schrieb Claus Zimmermann
<mail(a)clauszimmermann.de>de>:
Ok, ich hatte schon angenommen, daß Hypothesen nicht im Experiment überprüft, sondern
nachgerechnet werden.
Ha, ja, so sehen das in der Tat unorthodoxe Theoretiker, wie bsp. Philip Gibbs: "A
Universe Programmed with Strings of Qubits: It has been suggested that reality works like
a quantum computer, but such claims are just words if they are not backed up by sound
mathematics. In pursuit of the fundamental equations I look to string theory where
physicists led by Mike Duff have noticed useful connections between the quantum gravity of
black holes and quantum information theory. By building on my earlier work on universal
symmetry in string theory and using links between elliptic curves and hyperdeterminants, I
find intriguing clues that these connections may be deep as well as useful. Ultimately any
theory of the foundations of physics must explain why there are four forces and three
generations of fermions. In string theory this would be a consequence of the choice of
vacua. If a consistent formulation of string theory constructed from quantum bits can be
found, it may be possible to understand the vast landscape of possibilities better and
reverse engineer the program that codes our universe.“
https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3029
Angeregt durch Feynman’s Artikel von 1982: "Simulating Physics with Computers",
sind Quantencomputer ja gerade in der Entwicklung und ich bin gespannt, was daraus werden
wird.
Die Größe der Messwerte in den Experimenten ist naturgegeben, aber Theoretiker wurmt es
natürlich, dass die Naturkonstanten und Massen der Elementarteilchen nicht berechnet
werden können.
Ingo